Sunday, April 18, 2021

Dr Max Ephraim Melle: Trials and Tribulations

Dr M.E. Melle: Trials and Tribulations
My grandfather Max Louis Ephraim was born 1870 in Hamburg, Germany. 

He made his living as a merchant travelling as far as South America. In 1906 he arrived in New York City as a 'engineer' in transit to Winnipeg. Apparently detecting that there wasn't much need for either merchants nor engineers he switched to something more fashionable. By the end of 1907 he was working as Dr. Max Ephraim Melle in Montreal.

Business was good and by 1923 he was a naturalized Canadian and he even sponsored a local beauty contest contestant.


In November 1923 he advertised in the Ottawa Citizen newspaper.
He always appreciated big first class hotels.


But then things started to get awkward…
From the Montreal Gazette on December 23, 1923:


CORN TREATMENT HAS COURT ECHO
Woman Sufferer Charges Independent Chiropodist With False Pretenses
“ROOTS” WERE EXHIBITED
Expert Witness Claims Exhibits Never Came From Corns—Partner of Accused Explained Method

Whether or not corns have roots or have only a hard and irritating surface caused by tight footwear is a question which Judge Monet has to make more thorough inquiries into, following a case heard before the Enquete Court yesterday afternoon. Max Ephraim Melle, an independent chiropodist, accused of false pretences. by failing to rid Mrs. Henriette Roy of six corns, after she had paid $12 for the treatment. and had, she swore, been assured that “the roots were out.” and that she was cured.
Mrs. Roy testified that she saw a the accused on December 11 and that an operation was performed. Two thin and sharp objects, somewhat similar to small vermicelli before this is boiled, were exhibited, and were, according to what Mrs. Roy had been told, roots of two of the larger and more painful of her corns.

“My corns hurt just so much now,” said the complainant, with an apologetic laugh. “Dr. Melle told me that I would never suffer again from corns. He gave me two of the roots which he extracted; here they are.”

The thorn-like objects were examined by the court and the lawyers, and Adolph Gardner, counsel for the defence, cross-examined. “You did not expect.” he asked, “that you would be rid of your corns in one treatment?”

“He told me that I would not suffer any more.” replied Mrs. Roy. “Dr. Melle said that I could come back; but he never offered to treat me free of charge.” 

NO ROOTS IN CORN.
Arthur D. Bergeron, surgeon chiropodist and secretary of the Association of Chiropodists, 530 St. Catherine Street West, was questioned by Leopold Houle, for the prosecution. He stated that he has practised for six or seven years, and thought that he was competent in his branch of learning.

“There are no roots in corns,” he declared emphatically: “I am positive of that. Theses two exhibits,” he added, pointing to the objects claimed to have tortured the toes of Mrs. Roy, “could never have come from corns.”
Cross-examined by Mr. Gardner, Dr. Bergeron said that he received his diploma as a chiropodist at Chicago in 1917.
'What causes the formation of a corn?” asked the lawyer.
“Then a person walking about barefooted would never have corns?”
“Oh, yes, you can have corns on your hands,” replied the witness.
“Did you know that a newly-born child may have corns?”
“That is possible.” admitted the chiropodist.
“I suppose that would be a case of heredity Judge Monet, amid laughter.

“What is this? asked Mr. Gardner, holding up more of the alleged roots.
“It looks like a fishbone to me,” replied the witness.
“Did you ever see corns on the feet of people who never wear boots or shoes?” asked the lawyer. “I never had occasion to,” was the reply.
Bergeron went: on to say that the Association of Chiropodists does not recognize Dr. Melle “I don't believe he is a doctor,” he declared. 

KEPT PATIENT AMUSED.
Joseph A. Goulet, who stated that he been in partnership with the accused for about a year, declared that Dr. Melle was no more a chiropodist than he was himself. He gave a demonstration of how patients are treated by the accused, keeping court and spectators in constant hilarity by the most unusual antics. The accused, he declared, never allowed the patients to watch the operations closely, and kept up a steady stream of talk “to keep the patient amused.” The operation, he declared, consists in having a “root” concealed in the hand while a layer of adhesive ointment is rubbed on the corn. After some rubbing and squeezing, slight incision would be made and̶— here the witness illustrated—the “root” would be pulled out with a pair of tweezers and dangled in front of the client’s eyes.
Dr. Melle,” said the witness, with evident signs of irony. “is the only one in the world who works this way.
“Does the client feel the operation?"
“Oh, yes. He has to make them hurt a bit, you know.”
For such operations, the accused charged $3 per corn, said the witness, and his income was from $1,500 to $3,000 per month.
“He puts on this brown ointment,” explained Goulet. “He makes that himself: but in case the patient should become inquisitive he always has boxes containing real ointment on the table.”

Cross-examined, the witness said that he first met the accused in 1921, when he went to have his corns removed. The operation apparently did not meet with permanent success; but nevertheless he thought that the method was excellent and that the work was “pretty easy.” They agreed to go Into partnership, Goulet investing $2,000 in the venture. The main thing, he said, was to watch the patient and keep up the conversation. “I also treated the clients.” said the witness.
“You knew that the operations were not honest; still you were willing to-do this?" asked Mr. Gardner. The witness admitted this; but he had not been sure when he invested his money. He worked in order to have his investments returned. His weekly salary was $100.
“Dr. Melle told me that we could easily make from $50,000 to $100,000 a year,” said the ‘witness. Later he had opened up an office for himself in Toronto, but under the name “Dr. Melle,” because, he said, “everybody knows Dr. Melle.”
“I never took out any roots in Toronto,” said Goulet. “I worked like a real chiropodist there. I can’t remember anybody ever being cured.”

Mr. Leopold Houle insisted upon producing a sheet of paper, which he declared, showed conclusively that Dr. Melle had especial aptitude for judicious publicity, advertising himself discreetly in connection with a beauty contest.

Judgment was reserved until December 27. 

There were a few delays. One was until January 4, 1924 when he was “committed for trial” which was then put off to the month of May.

 

 

In July 1924 he appeared before Chief Judge Decariecharged with fraudulently obtaining obtaining food, lodging and other accommodation at the Windsor Hotel in the amount of $1,289.85. The case was remanded until July 16 for preliminary trial, bail being fixed at $500. A true bill was found against Dr. Melle at the beginning of the last term of the Court of King’s Bench for false pretenses. He is before the higher crimnal courts for having failed to cure a particularly obnoxious corn from the little toe of a woman, after guaranteeing, it is claimed, to make it vanish forever”.

(I couldn’t discover the resolution of this particular suit so I guess that my grandfather settled his outstanding bill).

 


Finally on August 30, 2024 great news! Dr. M.E. Melle was acquitted! 
The charges were discharged, the Crown declaring that there was no proof to offer. Max Bernfeld appeared for the defense.

  

Back in Business (What could go possible go wrong?)
The first of these adverts was April 1925 in Winnipeg.



 




The next one was May 1925 in the Vancouver Sun.


 

 

 




The next year Dr. Melle travelled all the way to Victoria BC to remove a few corns. That did not go so well! These next two are both from the Vancouver Sun in 1926.

 

Newspaper reports from April 9, 1926.

 


    
This seems like a repeat of the Montreal charges except this time the corns had cores instead of roots. A pathologist testified concerning the corn cores that To the best of my knowledge it is not human substance". It was neither crystalline nor amorphous, he added, going into technicalities. Uric acid was always in either of these forms. Its structure proved it was not made up of uric acid.

Mr Harrison was the prosecutor and Frank Higgins K.C. appeared for Dr. E.M. Melle. 
“Mr Harrison interposed at this juncture and stated that the case had simply become one which would either prove that Dr. Melle was a colossal fraud or else that he had struck upon an amazing cure for corns. It was the task of the prosecution to prove the truth of the first suggestion, he said.

Mr Higgins went on to invite all doctors of Victoria to a attend a demonstration, at which Dr. Melle would show how he extracted the ‘cores’ from the corns. Mr Harrison said he would be agreeable to such a proposal if he were allowed to be present. Mr. Higgins said he did not wish his client to be treated as a criminal, and that he would not consent to Mr. Harrison and the police officers being present at the demonstrations.
Dr Moore, said that if he believed a man to be a qualified medical practitioner he would certainly agree to watch him perform an operation of the sort Dr. Melle suggested. Under the circumstances, however, he did not wish to watch any such proceedings, he asserted.

Thus the medical establishment closed ranks. Once they had pre-judged a man as a fraud, quack and crook then they won't even allow him the courtesy of demonstrating a medical procedure that defied medical science! 

By 20th of that same month of 1926, the Victoria police had issued a warrant for the arrest of “Dr. E. M. Melle”. My grandfather -- not being a crook -- returned for trial (and a chance to “permanently” remove a few a more corns).


 






In reports of a remand at the end of the April, it was written that “Dr. Melle, according to the police, is continuing his business as a corn expert here. His treatment of corns has gained for him a considerable reputation. Police believe that there are a great number of persons who will vouch for the ability of Dr. Melle. He has given many relief it is claimed”.







Final Vindication!
Finally the court system in British Columbia realized there was insufficient evidence and withdrew all charges.
From the Vancouver Sun on May 20, 1926:

Victoria Corn Doctor Will Not Be Tried
Victoria, May 20.—Dr. Melle, who was charged in the city Police Court recently for quackery in connection with his corn cure processes and committed for trial, will not be tried, it was announced at the attorney-general’s department. After examining the evidence the attorney general has decided that it is insufficient to justify him continuing the prosecution, it was said. Accordingly, no indictment was presented against the corn doctor, when the spring assizes got under way here.

 

At that point my grandfather celebrated with a bit of sojourning. This report was in the Vancouver Sun on October 9, 1926.

 

 


By March 13, 1930 Dr Max Melle was spending most of his time direct marketing medical ointments -- and air fresheners -- that he manufactured in his Vancouver back yard.

I never met my grandfather and had been given to believe that he was some kind of quack or fraud. But as I found in this past week's research, while he was prosecuted twice, the evidence was so weak that the charges were dropped both times.


I still wonder why such interesting stories were kept hidden as family secrets from his children and grandchildren. 

Written by Gregory Melle in April 2021.


<script type='text/javascript' src='https://storage.ko-fi.com/cdn/widget/Widget_2.js'></script><script type='text/javascript'>kofiwidget2.init('Support Me on Ko-fi', '#29abe0', 'W7W47N9LX');kofiwidget2.draw();</script> 



Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Sometimes you can go back: Sawan Bali

“We can never go back again, that much is certain. The past is still close to us. The things we have tried to forget and put behind us would stir again...” Daphne Du Maurier writing in 'Rebecca' 

But occasionally at least, you can go back. As you poke into strange corners you might discover yourself standing in the exact same spot that you visited years before. Of course things won't be exactly the same but old memories -- especially those evoked from old photos -- will spring anew from hidden memory corners. 

While I have travelled much and still enjoy new discoveries, I also enjoy revisiting places first seen years before. In March 1975 I was in the middle of a Round-the-World trip. When I left Canada I had no intention of visiting the island of Bali in Indonesia but Australians that I met insisted that it was a 'must see'. I stopped off for a few days that became a few more and eventually turned into a two month sailing adventure. 

In mid-April I rented a scooter and then -- perhaps on the 18th -- I headed off to see the North Coast of Bali. 
Winding Roads and Rice Terraces


North Bali Water Buffalo

Greetings by Roadside Boys
Prompted by a line in some guide book I headed up a mountain road searching for the distinctive temples of Sawan village. As I came into town I stopped at the grand entrance to the local Hindu temple. It was covered with wild gargoyles, spirits and demons. As I brought out my camera I was surrounded by a crowd of children from the nearby school. Everyone shouted "hello mister", and everyone -- including one dog and a few dudes trying to look casual -- wanted in on the picture-taking. 
Dalem Temple, Sawan District, April 1975
Dalem Temple Crowd, April 1975
These remained two of my favourite travel photos. Over the years, I would look in guide books but never found more than a brief mention of Sawan and its temples.

Thursday, February 18, 2021

Room Gem Hotel Motel Management Notes

In the 1970s I really wanted to work in Hotel Management. I fell into some short-term and part-time jobs that included working on the front desk of the biggest hotel in Montreal. I later learned bartending and worked as banquet waiter.

in 1979 I completed the first year of Hospitality Management at BCIT in Burnaby, British Columbia; but fate intervened that summer and I never started the second year.

Eventually I completed a Software Programmer diploma and did a lot of database and software development work. I long searched for employment that combined all my interests but that was not to be. When I did get software work it was usually for something like an insurance company or a car assembly plant.

About 1992  during a period of severe under-employment  I decided that there might be a market for flexible management software aimed at the small to medium priced hotel or motel. At that pre-Internet point in time there were many options available for big hotel chains but not much for the smaller business.

I wrote a set of Notes setting out all the things that could be in in the software. While they do use the term 'Requirements' this is more a list of possibilities. At that time I was using Blue Gem as my business name and proposed Room Gem as the package name.  I set out to find investors and discovered  not for the first time — that I was a lousy salesman with few financial resources. The actual software was never written. 

Moving forward almost thirty years and I found myself describing my efforts online. I dug up my old backups and decided to put my old notes into a blog. I have only made a few formatting changes. You will see many questions were left for further investigation.

(The reformatting lost the footnotes which gave credit to The Hubbart Formula for Evaluating Rate Structures of Hotel Rooms, 1952. 'Available from the American Hotel & Motel Association')

Enjoy. 

Room Gem Notes

COMPUTERIZED
HOTEL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

I. ROOM GEM SYSTEM PROGRAMMING GOALS

A. QUICK AND EFFICIENT.

a. Vitally important to eliminate front desk bottlenecks.

b. Information must be instantly available on-line.

c. Copies of vital files should be downloaded to local computers.

1. In case of network problem information is still available.

d. No interference during shift changes.

e. Front desk entry screen should have a split screen mode.

1. would allow two clerks to efficiently use the same terminal.

2. this is quite important at smaller facilities.

B. FLEXIBLE AND EASY TO USE.

a. Regular maintenance to be done by front desk or accounting staff.

b. Multiple language displays are useful in some departments.

c. Full provision

1. for multiple currencies.

2. for multiple locations and companies.

3. and multiple tax rates.

C. ACCURATE DATA.

a. Essential to check for duplications and errors.

1. All data must be compared and corrected at time of entry.

2. Data corrections required once only.

D. EFFICIENT SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING.

a. Will allow easy software customization and maintenance.

b. Object oriented structured programming is required.

c. Use report writing and screen painter wherever possible.

d. Multi-user programming is done from the start.

1. System wide record locking.

2. Log off terminals after period of non-use.

E. END USER HELP.

a. Context sensitive on-line help must be available in all areas.

b. Software service required 24 hours a day.

1. Dial-in software control required.

2. Pagers & cellular phones allow full time programmer access.

F. DATA INTEGRATION & REDUNDANCY.

a. Data must be freely shared throughout the system.

1. Staff scheduling fully integrated with reservation information.

2. Management should find it easy to compare data from all departments.

b. Data elements should be stored in one location only (except for backups).

1. Data changes in one area will affect reporting in other areas.

II.

A. BACKUP COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS.

a. We need a manual backup system available 24 hours per day.

b. Audit files keep track of all transactions.

c. Transaction commitment and roll back

1. interrupted transactions to be cancelled or completed.

¨  no partially completed transactions in system.

¨  accurate indexes.

1. backup system to allow transaction roll back to any point in time.

A. EFFECTIVE SECURITY.

a. Encrypted password protection required.

1. with several levels of security.

b. Program files are compiled to prevent program tampering.

c. System level protection required on phone-in data lines.

B. NIGHT AUDITOR POSITION ELIMINATION.

a. Possible and desirable at most locations.

b. Reasons.

1. High responsibility position done under poor working conditions.

¨  low worker morale.

¨  high staff turnover.

¨  work done at night is more difficult, mistakes are common.

1. Audit is done under difficult front office conditions.

¨  accounting more efficient when done in accounting office.

1. Audit sometimes uncompleted before early morning checkouts.

¨  this means auditor is using front office during busy checkout time.

1. Higher use of credit cards.

¨  means fewer facility charges to guest folio accounts.

¨  means it is easier to correct billing mistakes after checkout.

1. Night staff better utilized handling serious late night problems.

a. Methods.

1. Most guest charges should be entered by facility staff.

¨  staff entering data require personal data entry accuracy.

¨  each cashier responsible for balancing at end of shift.

1. Credit card charges and cash count corrections done in daytime.

¨  can easily be done by early morning accounting staff.

1. Computer system will automatically do scheduled new day turnover.

¨  tape backups started by afternoon accounting staff.

¨  rooms are posted automatically to new day's room charges file.

¨  no interference between day turnover and front desk work.

¨  vouchers and cash paid-outs can be balanced several times a day.

¨  night staff only responsible for late night charges.

¨  all reports can be run for any period in time.

¨  means that backup copies are not needed.

¨  only summary reports are printed. Done during the day shift.

¨  other reporting is done better on display screen.

1. Day end turnover can be at any set time.

¨  does not have to be the same time as room posting time.

¨  perhaps at noon instead of middle of the night.

a. Remaining Night Audit Duties.

1. A few night auditing duties will still have to be done at night.

¨  confirming cash register readings.

¨  preparation of folios for express check-out.

¨  night manager duties.

1. These can all be done by the remaining front office & security staff.

COMPUTER SYSTEM FEATURES 

I. DEPARTMENTS

A. Integrated information in all departments:

a. Front Office.

b. Reservations.

c. Food, Beverage & Catering.

d. Mail / Fax / Phones.

e. Housekeeping & Repairs.

f. Laundry / Valet.

g. Security.

h. Accounting, Personnel & Payroll.

i. Management & Planning.

j. Sales, Publicity & Public Relations.

II. RESERVATIONS

A. RESERVATION REQUEST.

a. MULTIPLE SOURCES.

1. Letter.

2. Telex, telegram or fax.

3. Phone.

4. Walk-in.

5. Travel agent, airline or housing bureau.

6. Convention or group.

7. Central reservation office or chain office.

b. PREFERENCES.

1. Floor - higher or lower.

2. Location - front / back / view.

3. Adjoining or connecting rooms / same floor.

4. Smoking or non-smoking.

c. MEAL PLANS.

1. American Plan (AP & MAP).

2. European Plan (EP).

3. Convention & Group Meals.

d. LENGTH OF STAY, ARRIVAL & DEPARTURE DATES.

1. Redundancy for confirmation.

e. TIME OF ARRIVAL.

1. Guaranteed or confirmed.

f. NUMBER OF PEOPLE.

1. Cots, twin, double, double double, etc.

g. IDENTIFICATION.

1. Name, address & company affiliation.

h. CONFIRMATION.

1. Is mailed with all data displayed.

¨  including check-in and check-out time information.

1. Only a range of room rates is confirmed for hotel reservations.

¨  other types of reservations require a set rate.

a. PERMANENT RESERVATIONS.

1. Permanent live-in hotel guest.

2. Business traveller on a regular schedule.

b. RIDING RESERVATIONS.

1. Uncertain date of arrival.

c. SPECIAL FACILITIES & REQUESTS.

1. Convention or Group Delegate.

2. TA (Travel Agent).

3. VIP. also called SPATT (Special Attention) or DG (Distinguished Guest).

A. FILE STRUCTURE.

a. Reservations must be allowed any time in the future.

1. Future reservations will be confirmed only as to type and class.

¨  they will be compared to RZFUTURE file with one record for each date.

¨  this file will also have future pricing information.

1. Files will be opened for room assignment several weeks in advance.

¨  the file names for these files will indicate date.

¨  room assignments will be made for all reservations open for date.

¨  date record for previous day will be deleted.

1. File records for days completed will be moved to audit files.

I.

II. FRONT OFFICE COMPUTERIZATION.

A. FRONT DESK REGISTRATION.

a. QUESTIONS ASKED GUEST.

1. Name.

2. Address.

3. Company.

4. Method of payment.

5. Room preference.

¨  room type.

¨  room number.

¨  smoking or non-smoking, etc.

1. Number of guests.

2. Group name & id number.

3. Departure date.

4. Automobile id.

¨  for parking and motel identification.

a. INFORMATION PROVIDED GUEST.

1. Liability disclaimer.

2. Hotel facility specials.

3. Perhaps multi-language.

b. RESERVATION CARD.

1. Presented for signature and confirmation.

c. PAYMENT METHOD.

1. Displayed in order of facility preference.

2. Computerized confirmation after credit card presentation

¨  approval number saved with request information.

1. Take account of both hotel and individual floor limits.

a. MEAL PLANS REQUESTS.

1. American Plan (AP) and Modified American Plan (MAP) facilities.

¨  use a default BLD code that can be modified by the clerk.

a. IDENTIFICATION CARDS.

1. Some properties provide ID cards to validate guest at hotel facilities
or when signing charges.

b. KEYS.

1. Often computerized with electronic door locks.

c. BELL SERVICE / DOORMEN / CONCIERGE.

1. Must be informed of the guest names and room numbers.

2. Commonly done with a copy of registration slip.

¨  could also be done with a bell captain desk terminal.

1. Computer should keep track of front rotation.

2. Concierge could use terminal for ticket sales and reservations.

I.

a. GROUP CHECK-IN.

1. Room Gem should print

¨  key envelopes coded by groups.

¨  in house ID cards.

¨  group baggage tags.

¨  and rooming lists.

a. PAYMENT IN ADVANCE. 

1. Guest is flagged to prevent charges made in other departments.

A. ROOM ASSIGNMENTS (done by the Room Clerk using Room Rack display).

a. REGISTERED, NOT ASSIGNED (RNA).

1. RNA means the guest arrived early and no room is available.

2. While they are waiting the hotel may allow folio charges.

b. BLOCKING & ASSIGNING ROOMS.

1. Room clerk selects from a list of appropriate available rooms.

2. Room Gem should assist management goals such as:

¨  rotating room usage equally.

¨  increasing occupancy in higher rate rooms.

¨  restricting wings or floors to save energy.

1. It has been difficult to manipulate rooms with a computer system

 room rack "solitaire" is used to manipulate groups and vacancies into blocks.

¨  this should be easy to do with a mouse and a graphic display.

1. Display should use the same order as the actual physical order.

2. Reserved rooms are blocked before guest arrival

¨  this must be flexible enough for last minute changes.

¨  display must make obvious which rooms are blocked or occupied.

a. SELL-UP.

1. Room Gem should assist sell-up to higher priced rooms.

b. SHOWING ROOMS.

1. It is the best way to sell a room.  It can be done

¨  with a screen monitor at the desk.

¨  or with computer printed charts.

a. ROOM RACK SYMBOLS & COLOURS.

1. Modifiable by management according to individual needs.

2. Colours should flag special types of rooms such as

¨  special views.

¨  corner rooms.

¨  and adjoining rooms. 

1. Standard Symbols.

¨  S=Single

¨  D=Double

¨  K=King

¨  Q=Queen

¨  St=Studio

¨  H=Sofa(Hide-a-bed)

¨  DD=Twin-Double or Double-Double.  

¨  Perhaps we should use such graphic symbols  such as ³, º, K, Q, », ±, _.  

1. Other symbols might be needed for Tub and/or shower etc.

2. "M/M & FAM" = Mr. Ms. & family.

3. there could be a gradual size or colour progression in the room status symbols.

a. ROOM CHANGES.

1. Ideally room changes should be a mouse drag & drop operation.

2. Sometime the change is to the lobby until the new room is ready.

b. ON-CHANGE & OUT-OF-ORDER.

1. On-Change (OO) is short term (housekeeping).

2. Out-of-Order (OOO) is longer term (repairs & painting).

A. HOUSEKEEPING DEPARTMENT.

a. ROOM STATUS.

1. Must be transmitted between the front office and housekeeping.

2. Sometimes the arriving guest is given a temporary room

which can be changed to a permanent room later.

b. DISTANCE FROM FRONT OFFICE.

1. Might be far enough to require non-network communications.

c. PERSONAL INFORMATION.

1. Housekeeping normally not informed of personal guest information.

B. INFORMATION RACK DISPLAYS.

a. Arranged alphabetically for fast lookup.

b. Are required for use by phone operators etc.

c. Should include

1. people expected to arrive soon.

2. and those who have recently departed.

C. MAIL / MESSAGES / FAX / E-MAIL / TELEPHONE.

a. MAIL RACKS.

1. Used less and less in the 90's.

2. But a system to handle the guest's Fax messages is now required.

b. PHONE BILLING.

1. Smart switches allow for a direct interface with computer billing.

2. Otherwise nightly posting of phone charges is required.

I.

A. GROUPS & CONVENTIONS.

a. GROUP ID.

1. Each group needs its own unique group ID.

b. ATTENDANCE COUNT.

1. Expected number in group

¨   plus or minus actual sales difference

¨   less casualty factor (cancellations & no-shows)

¨   equals number of people actually attending.

a. RATE QUOTATIONS.

1. With flat rate all guests pay the same rate

©  assignment is on best available basis (called Run of the House).

©  equitable distribution required between types of rooms & rates.

1. With a spread all rates

¨  are reduced a certain number of dollars.

¨  or are reduced a certain percentage.

A. ROOM AVAILABILITY CALCULATIONS.   (percentages used are management options)

a. ESTIMATED ADJUSTED STAYOVERS equals

¨      Rooms Occupied Last Night

¨    plus Complimentary Rooms (if not listed as being occupied)

¨  equals Actual Rooms Occupied Last Night

¨    less Adjusted Departures:

¨   [Announced Departures

¨   plus Estimated Understays (@6.0%)

¨   less Estimated Overstays (@2.0%)].

a. ESTIMATED ADJUSTED RESERVATIONS equals

¨   Announced Reservations

¨   plus Early Arrivals (@0.5%)

¨   less Cancellations  (@2.0%)

¨   less No-Shows       (@5.0%).

a. TOTAL ROOMS COMMITTED equals

¨ (Stayovers) plus b. (Reservations).

a. SPACE AVAILABLE FOR SALE equals

¨   Total Rooms in facility

¨    less Rooms Out-of-Order

¨    less c. (Total Rooms Committed).

a. ROOMS OCCUPIED TONIGHT equals

¨     c. (Total Rooms Committed) plus Estimated Walk-Ins.

A. RATE CALCULATIONS.

a. SPLIT RATES.

1. Indicates rate split between two or more guests in the same room.

2. Recorded as fraction of the full rate on each card

¨  or the full rate on one card.

¨  and a “shares with” indication on another card.

1.  The system must account for late check-ins

¨  or early check-outs by one of the people sharing the room.

a. CHANGEOVER HOUR.

1. Shows when the break comes between charging for the previous night or the new day.

1. It is a management setup option and usually between 5 and 7 am.

a. HOURLY RATES.

1. Some hotels are experimenting with flexible rates

¨  an adjustment is made according to whether a person checks out

well before or well after the normal check-out time.

1. The hour could be the future basic unit of rate measurement.

a. WEEKLY & MONTHLY RATES.

1. Usually payment is prepaid.

2. Normal daily rate is posted

¨  until the deposit is almost exhausted.

¨  Then there is a reduced daily rate or free days until prepaid period ends.

1. This keeps accounting simple if the guest checks-out early.

a. DOUBLE OR TRIPLE OCCUPANCY.

1. Often charged at single rate or just slightly more.

2. The third person is often charged a flat extra charge.

3. Extra charges are also charged for cots brought into room.

b. PARLOUR ACCOMMODATION.

1. If one person occupies two connecting rooms.

¨  Do we register them once only in only one room?

¨  Perhaps this requires a master folio?

a. RATES FOR SPECIAL PEOPLE.

1. Special rate percentage reductions are offered.

2. For TA's (travel agents) this is commonly 50% off.

b. COMP & REDUCED RATES.

1. Should be recorded at the full rack rate

¨  with an accounting amount posted to a comp allowances account.

¨  to record the full cost of reduced or free accommodation.

a. DAY RATES.

1. Are commonly for 6 hours at 1/2 the full rate.

2. These options must be set up by management.

I.

II. ACCOUNTING & PAYROLL PRINCIPLES

A. ACCOUNT CODES.

a. Accounts should be accessible by a mnemonic account code.

b. There should also be a code to access external accounting systems.

B. Debit and Credit required for each transaction.

III. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.

A. LEDGERS.

a. Each transaction creates a debit and a credit

1. posting to folio requires a contrary posting to either the guest or city ledger.

2. Guest ledger charges are later posted to city ledger accounts.

b. Comp Room Transactions.

1. Often there are two accounts

¨  a master A account for complimentary (or prepaid) charges.

¨  and another B account for individual charges.

a. GUEST LEDGER.

1. Transient Guests are those currently registered in the hotel.

¨  Their transactions are recorded in the Guest Ledger and posted as soon as possible.

1. Room charges are posted each night.

a. CITY LEDGER.

1. This Ledger includes

¨  accounts for customers who do not occupy sleeping rooms.

¨  usually local companies.

¨  Consolidation accounts for Guest Ledger transactions.

¨  posted at regular intervals (monthly?).

¨  Master accounts folios.

1. Master Account transactions.

¨  for tour companies.

¨  banquets and other catered events.

¨  for convention groups, etc.

¨  Options should allow posting of personal and group transactions.

1. Hotel Executive Accounts.

¨  monthly billing or payroll deduction.

1. Delinquent Accounts and Returned Cheques.

¨  reported and attempted collection.

¨  if over petty delinquent account collection limit.

¨  if uncollected then transfer to Unrecoverable Receivables.

1. Credit Card accounts.

¨  one for each type of card.

¨

a. DUE BILLS.

1. Used to handle non-billed rooms given hotels, advertisers etc.

2. Usually accepted at highest available room rate to use up quickly.

3. Should be recorded as advertising expense liability

¨  which is reduced when due bill is presented to pay room charges.

a. TRAVEL AGENCY ACCOUNTING.

1. Travel agencies must receive prompt reporting on all referred guests.

2. When agency collects room charge it must be collected from them.

3. Agency commissions must be remitted regularly.

4. Agency must get prompt notification of DNA’s (Did Not Arrive).

b. ADVANCE DEPOSITS.

1. Advance deposits should be recorded as liability until checkout.

I. CASHIER BALANCING & CONTROLS.

A. CASH REPORT ENTRY SCREEN.

a. Required to balance at beginning and end of work shift.

1. Cash on Hand.

2. Cheques, Vouchers, etc.

b. Bank is cash float for making change and cashing cheques etc.

c. Net Receipts  equals Total Receipts less Total Paid-Outs.

a. Overage and Shortage
¨  is difference between Amount Actually On-Hand
¨                    and Amount Should Be On-Hand.

a. Turn-In.
¨  equals Checks, Vouchers
¨     and other Non-Negotiable Items
¨     and All Cash Except the New Bank.

a. Due Back.  (also known as Difference Returnable, Due Bank, Exchange or Difference Returnable).

1. is amount needed to reconstitute the Bank.

2. total of cheques, Paid-Out Vouchers and excess Cash.

b. Verification.

1. is difference between the Turn-In and the Amount Due.

A. CASHIER'S REPORT.

a. Cheque List.

1. If bank information is entered at time of presentation then a detailed list of cheques can be printed without later input.

1. List should include travellers cheques and types of payment.

a. Voucher List.

1. This would keep track of all Vouchers & Paid-Outs.

2. As in cheque list information is entered at time of posting.

I.

II. STATISTICS

A. ROOM OCCUPANCY STATISTICS.

a. HUBBART ROOM RATE FORMULA:

Operating Expenses

  plus Taxes, Insurance, etc.

A.   plus Depreciation (at Standard Rates on Present Fair Value eg. 15% p.a.)

  plus Reasonable Return on Present Fair Value of Property  (eg. 10% p.a.)

  less Credits from Sources Other Than Rooms such as Income from Store Rentals, Income from Food & Beverage, Net Income from Other Operated Departments, and Miscellaneous Income

equals Amount to be Realized from Guest Room Sales to Cover Costs
and a Reasonable Return on the Present Fair Value of the Property (1).

Number of Guest Rooms Available for Rental times 365.25

  times Average Occupancy Rate eg. 75%

equals Number of Rooms to be Occupied at Estimated Average Occupancy (2).

Reasonable Return (1) divided by Number of Rooms Occupied (2)

equals the Average Daily Rate per Occupied Room Required to Cover Costs

   and a Reasonable Return on Present Fair Market Value (3).

As an alternative the Reasonable Return (1) could be divided by

(the total square footage available for rent multiplied by the average annual occupancy rate) to get the average rate per square foot.

This rate would then be multiplied by the square footage of each type of room.

 

a. IDEAL ROOM RATE:

According to this approach the hotel should sell an equal percentage of rooms in each rate class instead of filling from the bottom up.  This spread produces an average rate equal to the average rate earned when the hotel is completely full.  Differences between the ideal average rate and actual rates for each rate group could mean poor salesmanship, housekeeping or a problem with the rate structures.

A sample calculation:

200 rooms @ $50 single and $65 double.

300 rooms @ $65 single and $84 double.

100 rooms @ $70 single and $92 double.  Total of 600 rooms.

 

At 70% occupancy and 10% double occupancy the ideal rate is computed:

From the bottom up:

200 rooms @ $50 +    20 rooms @ $15 (double     = $10,300

220 rooms @ $65 +    22 rooms @ $19 supplement) =  14,718

420 (70% occupancy)  42 (10% double occupancy)    $25,018

 

From the top down:

100 rooms @ $70 +    10 rooms @ $22         = $ 7,220

300 rooms @ $65 +    30 rooms @ $19     =  20,070

 20 rooms @ $50 +     2 rooms @ $15     =   1,030

420 (70% occupancy)  42 (10% double occupancy)    $28,320

Average total revenue:            $26,669

Average Total Revenue divided by Occupied Rooms (420)

   equals the Ideal Average Room Rate ($63.50).

A.OCCUPANCY STATISTICS.


a. OCCUPANCY PERCENTAGE.

1. The Common Occupancy Percentage

¨      equals Number of Rooms Sold
¨  divided by Number of Rooms Available for Sale.

1. Out-of-Order Rooms - if taken from Rooms Available
¨  the percentage indicates sales clerk salesmanship.

1. Rooms Sold Count.

¨  This can be affected by which rooms are included.

¨  The counting scheme selected less important than consistency.

¨  Day Occupancy is generally omitted.

¨  Why not express them as a percentage?

¨  Should emergency sleeping accommodation be included?

¨  Should parlours be included?

¨  Dormitory style... count the number of beds sold?

¨  Permanent or Guaranteed reservations without occupancy.

¨  Do we count these people in the house count?

¨  Comp rooms, are these to be counted?

¨  This is especially in a Casino (many Comp rooms).

a. DOUBLE OCCUPANCY PERCENTAGE.

1. Actually a measure of multiple occupancy.

2. It is a percentage

¨  calculated as (Number of Guests less Number of Rooms Sold)

¨  all divided by the Number of Rooms Sold.

1. Sometimes it is a Guests Per Room ratio:

¨  calculated as Number of Guests

¨     divided by Number of Rooms Sold.

a. BED OCCUPANCY PERCENTAGE.

1. Common used in most of the world, very rarely found in United States.

2. Also known as Guest Occupancy or Sleeper Occupancy.

3. It is a percentage

¨  calculated as Number of Beds Sold

¨  including cots and hide-a-beds,

¨  Doubles, Queens & Kings are counted as 2 people

¨  unless sold as single when no other singles available,

¨  divided by Number of Beds Available for Sale.

1. 70 percent room occupancy usually means about 50 percent bed occupancy.

C. SALES RATIOS.

a. SALES PER OCCUPIED ROOM.

1. Also known as Average Room Rate or Average Daily Rate (ADR).

2. It is the rate earned per day per occupied room

¨  calculated as Room Income divided by Number of Rooms Sold.

a. SALES PER AVAILABLE ROOM.

1. Sales (Revenue) per Available Room.

¨  previously known as Average Rate per Available Room.

¨  calculated as Room Income

¨     divided by Number of Rooms Available for Sale.

1. Sales (Revenue) per Guest.

¨  previously known as Average Rate per Guest.

¨  calculated as Room Income

¨     divided by Number of Guests.

¨  this ratio is particularly important in American Plan hotels.

1. Total Sales (Revenue) per Available Room.

¨  calculated as Total Operating Income

¨     divided by Number of Rooms Available for Sale.

a. NUMBER OF TIMES THE AVERAGE RATE WAS EARNED.

¨  Total Income Before Fixed Charges

¨  also known as House Profit.

¨  Net Profit from all Operating Departments.

¨  divided by Number of Available Rooms,

¨  divided by Sales per Occupied Room.

a. POTENTIAL OPTIMUM REVENUE RATIO (POR).

1. Commonly used by financial institutions & appraisers.

2. Also known as the Rate Achievement Percentage.

¨  calculated as Room Income

¨     divided by Potential Optimum Income

¨  which is income from all rooms sold at full rate.

1. Average Optimum Daily Room Rate is

¨  calculated as Potential Optimum Income

¨     divided by Number of Rooms Available for Sale.

1. Ratio of Actual to Optimum Room Rates is

¨  calculated as Average Actual Daily Room Rate

¨     divided by Average Optimum Daily Room Rate.

a. AVERAGE LENGTH OF GUEST STAY.

¨  calculated as Number of Guests Nights

¨     divided as Number of Guest Arrivals.